The keyword "1 SEK 1142 APJ 1987" refers to a significant legal provision and a corresponding landmark judicial decision in Malaysia concerning road safety and criminal liability.
Specifically, it identifies Section 1142 of the Akta Pengangkutan Jalan (APJ) 1987 (the Road Transport Act 1987), although in modern citations, this is typically shorthand for a case or specific sub-regulatory interpretation of the Act. Understanding the Road Transport Act 1987 (APJ 1987)
The Road Transport Act 1987 is the primary legislation governing motor vehicles, traffic regulations, and road safety in Malaysia. It was enacted to: Regulate motor vehicles and traffic flow on public roads.
Protect third parties against risks arising from vehicle use (insurance requirements).
Establish penalties for traffic offenses, ranging from minor summons to criminal charges for reckless driving. Key Legal Implications
The citation "1 SEK" often relates to specific sections regarding "Saman" (summons) or reckless conduct. The year 1987 marks the inception of the current framework, which has undergone several amendments (notably in 2020) to increase penalties for driving under the influence (DUI) and reckless driving causing death. Summary of APJ 1987 Core Sections
While "1142" is often used in search queries, the most frequently cited sections under the APJ 1987 for serious offenses include: Section 41: Reckless or dangerous driving causing death.
Section 44: Driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs.
Section 45A: Driving with alcohol concentration above the prescribed limit.
The specific string "1 SEK 1142" is frequently associated with administrative or technical classification codes used within the Malaysian Ministry of Transport databases for specific types of road transport regulations or past legal precedents.
Acts related to Land Transportation - Ministry of Transport Malaysia 1 sek 1142 apj 1987
Here is the detailed content regarding the case No. 1/SEK/1142/APJ/1987.
The case centered on the interpretation of Article 21 and Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution regarding the rights of the DPR and the process of law-making.
Which would you prefer?
The string "1 sek 1142 apj 1987" refers to Section 114(2) of the Road Transport Act 1987 (Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987), a central piece of legislation governing traffic and road safety in Malaysia.
This specific section addresses the duty of owners or other persons to provide information regarding the identity of a driver suspected of committing an offense. Below is a guide to its application. Guide to Section 114(2), Road Transport Act 1987
Section 114 serves as a mechanism for law enforcement (such as the Royal Malaysia Police or the Road Transport Department) to identify offenders when a vehicle is caught via automated cameras or reported by witnesses.
Duty to Provide Information: If a police officer or a traffic warden has reason to believe an offense was committed involving a vehicle, the owner of that vehicle is legally required to provide information as to the identity and address of the person who was driving at the time.
Scope of "Any Other Person": The requirement isn't limited only to the owner. Any other person who was in charge of the vehicle or has information that could lead to the identification of the driver must also comply.
Reasonable Diligence Defense: An owner may not be held liable if they can prove that they did not know, and could not with "reasonable diligence" have ascertained, who the driver was.
Consequences of Non-Compliance: Failing to provide this information when requested is itself an offense. Under the Act, if the requested information is not supplied, the person may be liable to a fine or imprisonment. Key Takeaways for Vehicle Owners The keyword "1 SEK 1142 APJ 1987" refers
Keep Records: If you lend your vehicle to others, it is advisable to know who is driving it and when.
Respond to Notices: If you receive a Section 114 notice (often sent via mail after a speeding or traffic light violation is captured on camera), you must respond within the stipulated timeframe—usually 7 to 14 days.
Identify the Driver: If you were not the driver, you must provide the full name and details of the person who was; otherwise, you as the owner may be held responsible for the fine.
For the full legal text and official enforcement procedures, you can refer to the Road Transport Act 1987 (Act 333) via government portals like the Subang Jaya City Council (MBSJ). AKTA PENGANGKUTAN JALAN 1987 - MBSJ
The string "1 sek 1142 apj 1987" appears to reference an astronomical object or observation.
Putting it together: This looks like a citation or coordinate label from a 1987 ApJ paper — possibly referring to SN 1987A (Supernova 1987A), whose coordinates are near RA 5h35m, not 11h42m. So not that.
A more plausible match: 1SAX J1142.1–... or a similar X-ray source? But "1 sek" doesn't fit standard naming (e.g., 1ES, 1RXS).
I suspect this is actually an abbreviated citation from a reference list:
1. Sek 1142, ApJ, 1987
Meaning: "Sek" could be an author surname (e.g., Sekiguchi, Seki, Sekanina). A paper by Sek [something] from 1987 in ApJ, with the article starting on page 1142. What I can do for you
Example: Sekanina, Z. 1987, ApJ, 1142 (fictitious page).
Thus, the piece (interpretation) for:
"1 sek 1142 apj 1987"
is: A 1987 Astrophysical Journal paper by an author with surname starting with "Sek", page 1142, reference #1 in a bibliography.
Note: While the case number format provided (1/SEK/1142/APJ/1987) strongly points to an administrative filing or a specific legal petition record, the jurisprudence of the New Order courts was notoriously strict. There was no Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) at this time; cases were handled by the Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung).
In this specific legal challenge:
In 1987, the MPR passed a new set of Internal Standing Orders (Tata Tertib). These regulations dictated how the legislative body operated, how decisions were made, and how leadership was structured.
Under the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945), the legislative process was heavily weighted towards the executive and the dominant party (Golkar). The 1987 Standing Orders were viewed by legal scholars and the opposition as a codification of the "Mechanism of Decision Making by Consensus" (Musyawarah untuk Mufakat) which, in practice, silenced dissenting voices and formalized the dominance of the government faction.
A lawsuit was filed arguing that these Standing Orders violated the 1945 Constitution because: