Here’s a full-feature comparison and improvement guide for TopVAZ vs GitHub — focusing on making TopVAZ better by learning from GitHub’s strengths while keeping its own advantages.


Part 5: Pricing – The Financial Reality Check

| Feature | GitHub (Team Plan) | TopVAZ (Enterprise Self-Hosted) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Cost per user/month | $4 - $21 | $0 - $9 (self-hosted) | | Storage limit | 5GB (LFS costs extra) | Unlimited (your own disk) | | CI/CD minutes | 3,000 free, then pay | Unlimited (your own runners) | | SSO & SAML | Enterprise only ($21/user) | Included in base plan |

The Math: For a team of 50 developers, GitHub costs roughly $1,250 per month. TopVAZ (self-hosted on a $200/month dedicated server) costs $0 per month in licensing.

The Verdict: For cost-sensitive startups and enterprises with hardware, TopVAZ is far better.


2. Community and Maintenance

Software rots. A script that works today fails tomorrow when an API updates.

Verdict: GitHub is dramatically better for long-term projects.

9. Deployment & Hosting

Part 3: Security and Privacy – Where "Better" Matters Most

6. Advanced Code Navigation

4. Package & Artifact Management

Part 2: Speed and Performance – The "Better" Benchmark

🛠️ Implementation Priority (MVP → Pro)

| Phase | Features | |-------|----------| | Phase 1 (MVP) | Git backend, Issues, PRs, Basic UI | | Phase 2 (Collaboration) | Code review, Projects, Search | | Phase 3 (Automation) | CI/CD, Package registry | | Phase 4 (Security) | Dependabot, Secret scanning, CodeQL | | Phase 5 (Scale) | Self-hosted, API, Webhooks |